The Cato Supreme Court Review is an annual critique of
the Court's most important decisions from the term just ended, plus
an incisive look at the cases ahead.
The Cato Supreme Court Review is unlike any other
publication that follows the Court. First, it is timely. It is the
first scholarly review of the Court's most recent term. Second, it
is written not just for legal experts but also for the educated
public. Finally, its perspective is unique. In a collection of
essays by scholars, lawyers, and Supreme Court litigators, it
examines the Court's decisions and its upcoming cases in light of
the nation's first principles -- liberty and limited government --
as articulated in the Declaration of Independence and secured by
the Constitution.
The 2002-2003 edition of the Review includes the first
annual B. Kenneth Simon Lecture, "On Constitutionalism," by Douglas
H. Ginsburg, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit. Also featured are articles on
affirmative action, sexual freedom, the First Amendment, punitive
damages, campaign finance, property rights, federalism and
intellectual property. Contributors include Randy E. Barnett, Roger
Pilon, Thomas C. Goldstein, James L. Swanson, Robert Corn-Revere,
Eric S. Jaffe, Robert A. Levy, Bradley A. Smith, James E. Bond,
Ronald D. Rotunda, and Michael A. Carvin.
All chapters from this edition are available for
download in PDF format."
