The
Cato Supreme Court Review is an annual critique of the Court's most important decisions from the term just ended, plus an incisive look at the cases ahead.
The
Cato Supreme Court Review is unlike any other publication that follows the Court. First, it is timely. It is the first scholarly review of the Court's most recent term. Second, it is written not just for legal experts but also for the educated public. Finally, its perspective is unique. In a collection of essays by scholars, lawyers, and Supreme Court litigators, it examines the Court's decisions and its upcoming cases in light of the nation's first principles -- liberty and limited government -- as articulated in the Declaration of Independence and secured by the Constitution.
The 2002-2003 edition of the
Review includes the first annual B. Kenneth Simon Lecture, "On Constitutionalism," by Douglas H. Ginsburg, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Also featured are articles on affirmative action, sexual freedom, the First Amendment, punitive damages, campaign finance, property rights, federalism and intellectual property. Contributors include Randy E. Barnett, Roger Pilon, Thomas C. Goldstein, James L. Swanson, Robert Corn-Revere, Eric S. Jaffe, Robert A. Levy, Bradley A. Smith, James E. Bond, Ronald D. Rotunda, and Michael A. Carvin.
All chapters from this edition are available for download in PDF format.
